MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2204569122 · doi:10.1109/eusipco.2015.7362356

Perceptually-friendly rate distortion optimization in high efficiency video coding

2015· article· en· W2204569122 on OpenAlexaff
Sima Valizadeh, Panos Nasiopoulos, Rabab Ward

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRate–distortion optimizationComputer scienceHuman visual system modelVideo qualityCoding (social sciences)Data compressionComputer visionArtificial intelligenceMultiview Video CodingMetric (unit)Distortion (music)Algorithmic efficiencyCoding tree unitAlgorithmMathematicsDecoding methodsVideo trackingVideo processingStatisticsBandwidth (computing)EngineeringImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose the employment of a perceptual video quality metric in measuring the distortion in the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard. The mean square error presently used as quality metric is not a good measure to use, as it poorly correlates with human perception. Integration of a video quality metric based on the characteristics of the Human Visual System (HVS) inside the rate distortion optimization procedure is expected to improve the compression efficiency of the video coding. In this paper, the PSNR-HVS measure is used in the rate distortion optimization process. The compression efficiency of the proposed approach is compared to that used by HEVC, the recent video coding standard. Simulations prove that the proposed approach yields higher compression efficiency and provides better visual quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207