Connectivity Results of Complete Cubic Networks as Associated with Linearly Many Faults
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose the complete cubic network structure to extend the existing class of hierarchical cubic networks, and establish a general connectivity result which states that the surviving graph of a complete cubic network, when a linear number of vertices are removed, consists of a large (connected) component and a number of smaller components which altogether contain a limited number of vertices. As applications, we characterize several fault-tolerance properties for the complete cubic network, including its restricted connectivity, i.e., the size of a minimum vertex cut such that the degree of every vertex in the surviving graph has a guaranteed lower bound; its cyclic vertex-connectivity, i.e., the size of a minimum vertex cut such that at least two components in the surviving graph contain a cycle; its component connectivity, i.e., the size of a minimum vertex cut whose removal leads to a certain number of components in its surviving graph; and its conditional diagnosability, i.e., the maximum number of faulty vertices that can be detected via a self-diagnostic process, in terms of the common Comparison Diagnosis model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it