MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2204898672

Technological partnering and investment in Europe: the case of advanced electronic technologies in Canada

2014· article· en· W2204898672 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Technology Management · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Policy
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvestment (military)InterdependenceBusinessMarket economySovereigntyFace (sociological concept)Emerging technologiesPoliticsInward investmentIndustrial organizationInternational tradeCommerceEconomic systemEconomicsForeign direct investmentPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The view that the world economy is still one in which nations are thought of as sovereign bodies has become out–dated. Consequently, firms have become dependent on political and economic decisions that have been taken elsewhere in the world. Technology and investment have become interdependent. Consequently, governments can no longer face challenges of the new economy without thinking and acting globally and actively encourage alliances. They must find new ways of helping firms to attract new investment and technologies into firms and regions well as suggesting means of accessing niche markets abroad. This paper considers one such new approach taken by Canada through the Investment Prospecting Programme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it