MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2204956754 · doi:10.1109/ias.2015.7356816

Harmonic injection based adaptive control of IPM motor drive for reduced motor current harmonics

2015· article· en· W2204956754 on OpenAlexaff
Garin Schoonhoven, M. Nasir Uddin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)HarmonicsMotor driveTorqueHarmonicController (irrigation)Total harmonic distortionLyapunov stabilitySynchronous motorComputer scienceEngineeringVoltageNonlinear systemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a robust nonlinear controller for interior permanent magnet synchronous motors (IPMSM) based on maximum torque per ampere (MTPA). Harmonic reduction is achieved through strategic harmonic injection into the command voltages. Third harmonic injection also permits increased utilization (transfer ratio) of supply potential which facilitates a greater speed operating range. Stability of the control law state variables is demonstrated through Lyapunov stability criterion. Global asymptotic stability is assured through the application of criterion supported by Barbalat's lemma. Control expressions are derived using adaptive back-stepping technique, with estimation of dynamic load and mechanical coefficient ensuring optimal performance under dynamic operating conditions. The proposed system has been implemented in a co-simulation environment, with control system and machine model implemented in Matlab/Simulink and PSIM, respectively. The complete drive system is implemented using the DS1104 DSP board for a 3.7kW laboratory motor. Both experimental and simulation results have demonstrated excellent drive performance, harmonic distortion reduction and an increase in the linear modulation range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207