MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2205296709

Pluralism, Fundamental Rights, and Citizenship: The Language of a New Direction for the Teaching of Religion in Quebec

2011· article· en· W2205296709 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stéphanie Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueEducation et sociétés · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitizenshipPluralism (philosophy)CurriculumSociologyPoliticsReligious educationDemocracyCompetence (human resources)Citizenship educationPedagogyPolitical scienceSocial scienceEnvironmental ethicsEpistemologyLawSocial psychologyPhilosophyPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the recent changes in the environment of confessionalism in Quebec schools from the perspective of the place devolved to religion in education. After describing the legal and political steps that have led to a new secular concept of the relationship between religions and education, the author explores how social debate was summarized into pedagogical arguments, making religion one aspect of citizenship education. Drawing upon an analysis of the competence on religious education of the ethics and religious culture (ECR) curriculum, the author throws light on the disparities between original intentions and their translation into course content, in which two concepts of democracy and basic rights coexist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.020
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducation et sociétésSame topicReligious Education and SchoolsFrench-language works237,207