MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2205302881 · doi:10.1079/dfb/20103223634

<i>Physarum albescens</i> . [Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria].

2010· article· en· W2205302881 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T. I. Krivomaz, A. Michaud, D. W. Minter

Bibliographic record

VenueDescriptions of Fungi and Bacteria · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSlime Mold and Myxomycetes Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyBiological dispersalRubusHabitatVaccinium myrtillusEcologyForestryArchaeologyBiologyPopulationDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A description is provided for Physarum albescens , a facultatively nivicolous myxomycete. Some information on its dispersal and transmission and conservation status is given, along with details of its geographical distribution (Canada (Alberta and Quebec), USA (Alaska, California, Colorado, Florida, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia), Brazil, Japan, Russia (Chukotskyi Avtonomnyi okrug, Krasnoyarski krai, Primorskyi krai, Sverdlovskaya oblast, Tiumen oblast), Australia (New South Wales and Victoria), New Zealand, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia (Astrakhanskaya oblast, Leningradskaya oblast, Rostov-na-Donu oblast, Volgogradskaya oblast), Spain, Switzerland, UK, and Ukraine), hosts ( Cytisus oromediterraneus , Empetrum nigrum , Graminae , Larix sp., Nardus stricta , Pinus uncinata , Rubus sp., Salix sp., Saxifraga bronchialis , and Vaccinium myrtillus ), interactions and habitats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDescriptions of Fungi and BacteriaSame topicSlime Mold and Myxomycetes ResearchFrench-language works237,207