MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2205448886 · doi:10.20380/gi2015.35

Palpebrae superioris: exploring the design space of eyelid gestures

2015· article· en· W2205448886 on OpenAlexaff
Ricardo Jota, Daniel Wigdor

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Human-Computer Communications Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestureComputer scienceEyelidPerceptionModality (human–computer interaction)Human–computer interactionSpace (punctuation)Computer visionArtificial intelligencePsychologyMedicineNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we explore the design space of eyelid gestures. We first present a framework for the design space based on the anatomy of the eye, human perception, and complexity of the eyelid gesture. Based on the framework we propose an algorithm to detect eyelid gestures with commodity cameras, already existing in laptops and mobile devices. We then populate the design space by demonstrating prototypes based on 3 form factors: mobile devices, desktop, and horizontal surfaces. These prototypes demonstrate the breadth of eyelid gestures as an input modality. We follow the scenarios with a discussion of how eyelid gestures can contribute to an interactive environment, and conclude with a discussion on insights, design recommendations, and limitations of the technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.122 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada Human-Computer Communications SocietySame topicGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyFrench-language works237,207