MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2205481300 · doi:10.26522/tl.v2i1.111

The Tale, The Teller, the Telling, and the Told

2004· article· en· W2205481300 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Booth

Bibliographic record

VenueTeaching and Learning · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDigital Storytelling and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStorytellingGrandparentTragedy (event)NarrativeAsideStory tellingEnergy (signal processing)Media studiesPsychologyHistorySociologyLiteratureDevelopmental psychologyArtSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tn our contemporary world, opportunities for experiencing storytelling are often missing in the lives of many children. Aside from television's passive, non-interactive storying, some children hear no stories read or told until they go to school. With broken families, crowded schedules, new curricula, and urban development comes the tragedy of children without a storehouse of stories. Grandparents who might have told stories may be unavailable or live far away; the home may not be a storying place; stories may be foreign objects; television and computers may dominate the home and limit talk-time; parents may be shift workers; single parents may lack time and energy for sharing stories; storytelling may not be considered a significant experience by the adults in the home. It may be that school will have to bear the burden of story on its shoulders, and that teachers will be the story - tellers who reach most children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.022
Scholarly communication0.0160.010
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTeaching and LearningSame topicDigital Storytelling and EducationFrench-language works237,207