MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pesquisas em Ciência da Informação no Brasil e no Canadá

2009· article· pt· W2205576098 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lídia Eugênia Cavalcante, Basma Makhlouf Shabou

Bibliographic record

VenueEncontros Bibli Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação · 2009
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Science and Libraries
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este número especial franco-português de Encontros Bibli é fruto da colaboração entre pesquisadores em Ciência da Informação de escolas especializadas neste domínio no Brasil e no Canadá. A co-organização é de responsabilidade de duas pesquisadoras da área. Do lado canadense, Basma Makhlouf (doutoranda da Escola de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação (EBSI), da Universidade de Montreal. Do lado brasileiro, por Lidia Eugenia Cavalcante, professora da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0120.033
Science and technology studies0.0110.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncontros Bibli Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da InformaçãoSame topicInformation Science and LibrariesFrench-language works237,207