Editorial: Diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis – What is the role of endomyocardial biopsy?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present case report [1Moriyama N. Ohara T. Kanzaki H. Tsuda E. Ishihara M. Anzai T. Active cardiac sarcoidosis in a patient with adult-onset Kawasaki disease.JC Cases. 2015; 12: 68-71Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (2) Google Scholar], Moriyama et al. reported a case of adult-onset of Kawasaki disease and cardiac sarcoidosis. They clinically diagnosed their case as cardiac sarcoidosis using various imaging modalities, not based on histopathological confirmation by biopsy from an extracardiac organ or by endomyocardial biopsy. The definitive diagnostic test for cardiac sarcoidosis is endomyocardial biopsy; however, the sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy is low, which makes it sometimes difficult to diagnose suspected cases for cardiac sarcoidosis. While the lungs and thoracic lymph nodes are most commonly involved in sarcoidosis, myocardial involvement occurs in 20–30% of patients, although only 5% may be diagnosed antemortem [2Zipse M.M. Sauer W.H. Cardiac sarcoidosis.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014; 16: 514Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar]. Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis can also present in the absence of clinically evident extracardiac involvement, although this is somewhat less common [3Isobe M. Tezuka D. Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis: clinical characteristics, diagnosis and treatment.Int J Cardiol. 2015; 182: 132-140Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar]. Prognosis is highly variable in cardiac sarcoidosis, with 5-year survival rates ranging from 60 to 90%, which is related to extent and sites of cardiac involvement [4Yazaki Y. Isobe M. Hiroe M. Morimoto S. Hiramitsu S. Nakano T. Izumi T. Sekiguchi M. Prognostic determinants of long-term survival in Japanese patients with cardiac sarcoidosis treated with prednisone.Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 1006-1010Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (505) Google Scholar]. Most deaths due to cardiac sarcoidosis are due to ventricular arrhythmia or atrioventricular block, and progressive heart failure due to massive granulomatous and/or fibrosis infiltration of the myocardium. Given the potential mortality associated with cardiac sarcoidosis, early diagnosis associated with prompt therapy is critical and may be lifesaving. The diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis should be considered in two clinical scenarios: (i) in patients with extracardiac biopsy-proven sarcoidosis, with or without cardiac symptoms; and (ii) in patients with no previous histological diagnosis of sarcoidosis but with unexplained cardiomyopathy, atrioventricular block, or ventricular arrhythmia [2Zipse M.M. Sauer W.H. Cardiac sarcoidosis.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014; 16: 514Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar]. Cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis is particularly difficult to diagnose because the manifestations are nonspecific, and the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic modalities are limited. The international expert consensus statement released by the Heart Rhythm Society in 2014 recommended the use of cardiac history, 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG), and echocardiography for screening of patients with biopsy-proven extracardiac sarcoidosis for possible cardiac sarcoidosis [5Birnie D.H. Sauer W.H. Bogun F. Cooper J.M. Culver D.A. Duvernoy C.S. Judson M.A. Kron J. Mehta D. Cosedis Nielsen J. Patel A.R. Ohe T. Raatikainen P. Soejima K. HRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias associated with cardiac sarcoidosis.Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11: 1305-1323Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (777) Google Scholar]. Abnormalities on ECG, such as complete left or right bundle branch block, pathologic Q waves, second-degree or third-degree atrioventricular block, sustained or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, have been noted in 20–31% of sarcoidosis patients [6Lynch 3rd, J.P. Hwang J. Bradfield J. Fishbein M. Shivkumar K. Tung R. Cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis: evolving concepts in diagnosis and treatment.Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2014; 35: 372-390Crossref PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar]. Echocardiographic findings are often nonspecific, but the presence of echocardiographic abnormalities in patients with known extracardiac sarcoidosis should strongly suggest cardiac sarcoidosis. Echocardiographic abnormalities are reported in 24–77% of cardiac sarcoidosis patients [7Houston B.A. Mukherjee M. Cardiac sarcoidosis: clinical manifestations, imaging characteristics, and therapeutic approach.Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2014; 8: 31-37Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar]. Some more specific findings include wall thinning of the basal anterior septum (Fig. 1), regional wall aneurysm, or motion abnormalities not in a coronary artery distribution. Resting perfusion scintigraphy employing thallium-201 (201Tl) may show areas of decreased uptake in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. Segmental areas of decreased 201Tl uptake are believed to correspond to areas of fibrosis or granulomatous replacement. Gallium-67 (67Ga) accumulates in areas of active inflammation, and thus, has been employed in the detection of cardiac sarcoidosis. However, many areas of cardiac involvement are free of inflammation and consist only fibrogranulomatous scar which could not be detected by 67Ga. The sensitivity of 67Ga scintigraphy is 18–50%. 67Ga scintigraphy could detect skin and muscle lesions that cannot be clinically detected by any other tests, often aiding in biopsy-based diagnosis (Fig. 2). Recently, positron emission tomography (PET) and cardiac magnetic resonance (MRI) imaging techniques have replaced traditional radionuclide studies because of their superior diagnostic performance. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET (FDG-PET) is superior to 201Tl and 67Ga scanning in detecting early stages of cardiac involvement. As in the present case [1Moriyama N. Ohara T. Kanzaki H. Tsuda E. Ishihara M. Anzai T. Active cardiac sarcoidosis in a patient with adult-onset Kawasaki disease.JC Cases. 2015; 12: 68-71Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (2) Google Scholar], a pattern of focal uptake (patchy with no background activity) and focal on diffuse uptake (intense patchy uptake with less intense diffuse uptake) have been considered indicative of active granulomatous myocarditis. A meta-analysis to examine the role of FDG-PET scans in cardiac sarcoidosis showed 89% (79–100%) sensitivity and 78% (38–100%) specificity [8Youssef G. Leung E. Mylonas I. Nery P. Williams K. Wisenberg G. Gulenchyn K.Y. Dekemp R.A. Dasilva J. Birnie D. Wells G.A. Beanlands R.S. The use of 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis: a systematic review and metaanalysis including the Ontario experience.J Nucl Med. 2012; 53: 241-248Crossref PubMed Scopus (363) Google Scholar]. FDG-PET scanning can also provide a diagnostic modality for patients unable to undergo cardiac MRI because of the presence of implantable cardiac devices or severe renal dysfunction. FDG-PET requires a strict protocol of carbohydrate restriction and prolonged fasting to force the myocardium into free fatty acid metabolism and reduce the background myocardial activity [9Ishida Y. Yoshinaga K. Miyagawa M. Moroi M. Kondoh C. Kiso K. Kumita S. Recommendations for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for cardiac sarcoidosis: Japanese Society of Nuclear Cardiology recommendations.Ann Nucl Med. 2014; 28: 393-403Crossref PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar]. Cardiac MRI with gadolinium enhancement is increasingly becoming the technique of choice for the evaluation of cardiac sarcoidosis [7Houston B.A. Mukherjee M. Cardiac sarcoidosis: clinical manifestations, imaging characteristics, and therapeutic approach.Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2014; 8: 31-37Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar]. The presence of delayed gadolinium enhancement that is not consistent with a coronary artery distribution is suggestive of cardiac sarcoidosis and scar tissue formation, which is often found in the midmyocardium and epicardium as opposed to the endocardial predominance seen in ischemic disease. However, many other patterns of gadolinium enhancement and even a pattern that is typical for prior myocardial infarction can also represent cardiac sarcoidosis. Cardiac MRI readily outperforms radionuclide imaging for the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis, with a sensitivity of 76–100% and specificity of 78–92% [10Yoshida A. Ishibashi-Ueda H. Yamada N. Kanzaki H. Hasegawa T. Takahama H. Amaki M. Asakura M. Kitakaze M. Direct comparison of the diagnostic capability of cardiac magnetic resonance and endomyocardial biopsy in patients with heart failure.Eur J Heart Fail. 2013; 15: 166-175Crossref PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar]. Despite the above advanced imaging modalities, the only absolute test for organ involvement in sarcoidosis is histologic examination of tissue for the presence of non-caseating granulomas (Fig. 2). In patients with extracardiac sarcoidosis, lymph node or lung biopsy is typically targeted first due to the higher diagnostic yield and lower procedure risk. In those patients, myocardial involvement is commonly demonstrated with imaging modalities; routine endomyocardial biopsy to confirm myocardial involvement is not recommended, given the procedural risk and the characteristically low sensitivity of histologic examinations, revealing non-caseating granulomas in less than 25% of patients with cardiac sarcoidosis, as a result of the focal and patchy nature of cardiac sarcoidosis [2Zipse M.M. Sauer W.H. Cardiac sarcoidosis.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014; 16: 514Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar]. The infiltration has a predilection for the basal ventricular septum and the left ventricular free wall. On the other hand, in situations where patients are with unexplained atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia, or cardiomyopathy without a prior histological diagnosis of extracardiac sarcoidosis, obtaining pathology ultimately becomes important for diagnostic confirmation. Biopsies should be performed safely on the accessible cutaneous lesions or palpable lymph nodes that appear to be affected by radiographic abnormalities (Fig. 2). In cases of negative extracardiac biopsy or isolated cardiac sarcoidosis, endomyocardial biopsy may be required to confirm the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. Biopsies can be guided by electro-anatomic mapping or morphologic examinations, or performed during the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or before cardiac transplantation [11Chapelon-Abric C. Cardiac sarcoidosis.Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2013; 19: 493-502Crossref PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar]. In the diagnostic criteria for sarcoidosis of the Japanese Society of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disease, histopathological examination is the mainstay of diagnosis [3Isobe M. Tezuka D. Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis: clinical characteristics, diagnosis and treatment.Int J Cardiol. 2015; 182: 132-140Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar]; however, the criteria do not mandate positive biopsies (either cardiac or extracardiac) for diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis, as was diagnosed clinically in the present case without histopathological confirmation [1Moriyama N. Ohara T. Kanzaki H. Tsuda E. Ishihara M. Anzai T. Active cardiac sarcoidosis in a patient with adult-onset Kawasaki disease.JC Cases. 2015; 12: 68-71Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (2) Google Scholar]. Active cardiac sarcoidosis in a patient with adult-onset Kawasaki diseaseJournal of Cardiology CasesVol. 12Issue 3PreviewAdult-onset Kawasaki disease is a rare condition. Cardiac sarcoidosis is an uncommon cardiomyopathy which is characterized by progressive cardiac dysfunction, and abnormality on electrocardiography and morphological aberration of the heart. We report a first case of a combination of these rare conditions. The patient was initially diagnosed with Kawasaki disease based on the coronary artery aneurysms and a past medical history at the age of 20 years which was typical of Kawasaki disease. Decades later, he developed progressive cardiac dysfunction and a sudden-onset atrioventricular block. Full-Text PDF Open Archive
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".