MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Identifying Turning Points of Real Estate Cycles in Taiwan

2009· article· en· W2206139301 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chun‐Chang Lee, Chih-Min Liang, Hsing-Jung Chou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Real Estate Portfolio Management · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing Market and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)Bivariate analysisEconometricsAutoregressive modelComposite indexReal estateUnobservableQuarter (Canadian coin)EconomicsMarkov chainStatisticsMathematicsComputer scienceComposite indicatorGeographyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Executive Summary. This paper applies the bivariate Markov-switching autoregressive model (MS-ARX) to identify the turning points of real estate cycles. The model with the best fit is L (1)-MSIH (2)-AR (8), of which, there 8 lags and both the intercepts and variances are subject to the influence of unobservable variables. This model confirms that the Composite Leading Index is ahead of the reference cycles by one quarter. Generally speaking, the Composite Leading Index has been producing rather accurate identifications of the four troughs and three peaks announced by the Taiwan Real Estate Research Center.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Real Estate Portfolio ManagementSame topicHousing Market and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207