MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2206220693 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2015.71

Polygenetic (Polyphase) Karsted Hardground Omission Surfaces In Lower Silurian Neritic Limestones: Anticosti Island, Eastern Canada

2015· article· en· W2206220693 on OpenAlexaffabout
Noël P. James, André Desrochers, Kurt Kyser

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaQueen's UniversityGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyphase systemGeologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Exquisitely preserved and well-exposed rocky paleoshoreline omission surfaces in Lower Silurian Chicotte Formation limestones on Anticosti Island, Québec, are interpreted to be the product of combined marine and meteoric diagenesis. The different omission features include: 1) planar erosional bedding tops, 2) scalloped erosional surfaces, 3) knobs, ridges, and swales at bedding contacts, and 4) paleoscarps. An interpretation is proposed that relates specific styles of omission surface to different diagenetic–depositional processes that acted in separate terrestrial–peritidal–shallow neritic zones. Such processes were linked to fluctuations in relative sea level with specific zones of diagenesis such as: 1) karst corrosion, 2) peritidal–shallow subtidal erosion, 3) subtidal seawater flushing and cementation, and 4) shallow subtidal deposition. Most surfaces are interpreted to have been the result of initial extensive shallow–water synsedimentary lithification forming hardgrounds that were, as sea level fell, planed by inner-neritic abrasion, successively altered by exposure and subaerial corrosion, only to be buried by sediments as sea level rose again. This succession was repeated several times, resulting in a suite of recurring polyphase omission surfaces through many meters of stratigraphic section. Synsedimentary cloudy marine cements are well preserved and are thus interpreted to have been calcitic originally. Aragonite components are rare and thought to have been dissolved just below the Silurian seafloor. Large mollusks that survived such seafloor removal were nonetheless leached and the resultant megamolds were filled with synsedimentary calcite cement. These Silurian inner-neritic–strandline omission surfaces are temporally unique. They are part of a suite of marine omission surfaces that are mostly found in early to middle Paleozoic neritic carbonate sedimentary rocks. These karsted hardgrounds formed during a calcite-sea time of elevated marine carbonate saturation and extensive precipitation of marine cement. The contemporaneous greenhouse atmosphere was supercharged with CO2, leading to profound surface karst under strongly acid rain. Younger peritidal omission surfaces, although potentially formed during aragonite-sea or calcite-sea times, would have been subject to very different terrestrial diagenetic process with lower atmospheric pCO2 values but increasingly complex biogenic soils producing dissimilar alteration features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207