Bibliographic record
Abstract
El título y parte del contenido de este intercambio entre dos universitarios se inspiran en la novela epistolar Les liaisons dangereuses de Pierre Choderlos de Lachlos, que puede considerarse una exploración de las ironías de la condición humana. El intercambio de epístolas es entre el Dr. Alberto Golding y la Dra. Manman Touchstone, nombres inspirados en la alquimia. Golding es bueno como el oro pero potencialmente maleable; Touchstone, se utilizaba para probar la pureza del oro o la plata, y, en forma figurativa, para comprobar si algo o alguien es genuino. Aparte de alguna crítica al sistema académico, el tema fundamental de estas epístolas es el antifeminismo de la Edad Media haciendo referencia a algunas situaciones de la época contemporánea. Además de los escritos que revelan misoginia se hace referencia y analizan los poemas del siglo XIV sobre Melusina, una bella mujer que se metamorfoseaba en una serpiente
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".