MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2206397130 · doi:10.14740/jmc.v7i1.2387

Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma Associated With Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2016· article· en· W2206397130 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Susumu Takamatsu, Hiroto Nagano, S Ootsukasa, Yasuyuki Kawachi, Hiroshi Maruyama

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHepatocellular carcinomaRadiofrequency ablationIntrahepatic CholangiocarcinomaHepatectomyCytokeratinCirrhosisLiver cancerLiver tumorRadiologyCancerGastroenterologyPathologyInternal medicineAblationImmunohistochemistrySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The patient was a 70-year-old male with liver cirrhosis associated with viral hepatitis C. He underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) four times of in the 3 years prior to this reported event. Although he was closely followed after RFA by imaging every 3 - 4 months, a hypovascular and ill-defined tumor was revealed in segment IV of the liver by enhanced CT. The tumor expanded from the necrotic area associated with RFA performed 2 years prior. Because the tumor rapidly enlarged and was accompanied by a progressive tumor thrombus that filled the left portal vein, left hepatectomy was urgently performed. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen demonstrated that the tumor was mostly composed of moderately differentiated HCC. However, it also included obvious glandular structures with mucin production, which were immunohistochemically positive for both cytokeratin 7 and 19. These features are characteristic of cholangiocarcinoma; therefore the tumor was diagnosed as an uncommon combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC). From both pathological investigation and retrospective review of imaging results, the present cHCC-CC was presumed to derive from a locally recurring tumor with morphologic changes to the biliary phenotype induced by RFA for HCC. Both distant and intrahepatic metastases appeared 4 months after surgery and the patient died of cancer 15 months after surgery in spite of anti-cancer treatments. J Med Cases. 2016;7(1):28-32 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc2387w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207