MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2206769161 · doi:10.1109/iccke.2015.7365830

Designing a pervasive eye movement-based system for ALS and paralyzed patients

2015· article· en· W2206769161 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Reza Rahnama-ye-Moqaddam, Hamed Vahdat‐Nejad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSimon Fraser University
KeywordsComputer scienceGestureHuman–computer interactionInterface (matter)Eye movementUser interfaceMovement (music)Amyotrophic lateral sclerosisComputer visionArtificial intelligenceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detecting human eyes movement and using it for communication is very common for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and other locked-in and paralysis diseases. The majority of existing systems are very expensive and nearly all of them use special devices and cameras, mostly infrared based, that are not commonly available. For Persian patients there is no special user interface at all. The system introduced in this paper which is called EyeType uses just a normal webcam and a calibration-free algorithm to identify eye gestures and by using a specific user interface enables the patients to type what they want. To make it easier, a pervasive algorithm is applied to score the words that are mostly used and after collecting the required information, begins to suggest most possible words to the user as he/she types the initial letters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyFrench-language works237,207