Angiotensin IV induces tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase and paxillin in proximal tubule cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Angiotensin IV (ANG IV), the COOH-terminal hexapeptide fragment of angiotensin II (ANG II), binds to specific sites in the kidney, distinct from type 1 (AT(1)) and type 2 (AT(2)) receptors and designated type 4 (AT(4)) receptors. We determined signaling pathways for ANG IV in a proximal tubular cell line, LLC-PK(1)/Cl(4). In these cells, we found no specific binding of [(125)I]-ANG II. In contrast, ANG IV dose dependently competed for [(125)I]-labeled ANG IV binding, with no displacement by either ANG II, the AT(1) receptor antagonist losartan, or the AT(2) antagonist PD-123319. Saturation binding indicated the presence of AT(4) receptors of high affinity [dissociation constant (K(d)) = 1.4 nM]. ANG IV did not affect cAMP or cGMP production and did not increase cytosolic calcium concentration in these cells. In contrast, immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting studies revealed that ANG IV caused dose-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of p125-focal adhesion kinase (p125-FAK) and p68-paxillin within 2 min, with maximal stimulation at 30 min. ANG IV-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of p125-FAK and paxillin was not affected by pretreatment with either losartan or PD-123319, and ANG II (10(-7) M) did not induce protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Our results indicate that LLC-PK(1)/Cl(4) cells express ANG IV receptors, which we demonstrate for the first time are linked to tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion-associated proteins. This suggests that ANG IV, a product of ANG II metabolism, may regulate function of the focal adhesion complex in proximal tubule cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".