The Use of ‘World Wide Web in Students’ Learning of Tarbiyah and Teacher Faculty of IAIN Kendari
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>This Study aims at understanding what extent of the use of World Wide Web (WWW) in learning for students of Tarbiyah and Teacher Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Kendari improve the students’ learning achievement. The scope of the study is the use of WWW in learning for all subject of Tarbiyah Faculty students at IAIN Kendari. The Technique of Data Collection uses observation and Interview which are analyzed qualitatively. The subjects are the students of Tarbiyah and Teacher Faculty at IAIN Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. The finding shows that the use of WWW in Students learning of Tarbiyah Faculty tend to use the Web Mail and Search Engine Service where the most access are Google and Yahoo. Various information needed in learning whether cognitive, affective, social integration or personal integration, can be accessed by WWW. But, the students cannot access the WWW maximally because of the limitation of Wi-Fi Connection service in campus<em>.</em></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it