MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2208134708 · doi:10.1093/femspd/ftv098

Defective mutations within the translocation domain of<i>Clostridium difficile</i>toxin B impair disease pathogenesis

2015· article· en· W2208134708 on OpenAlexaff
Therwa Hamza, Zhifen Zhang, Roman A. Melnyk, Hanping Feng

Bibliographic record

VenuePathogens and Disease · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
KeywordsChromosomal translocationPathogenesisVirulenceClostridium difficile toxin BToxinMicrobiologyClostridium difficileMutantClostridium difficile toxin ABiologyGeneticsImmunologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Clostridium difficile toxin B is one of the main virulence factors and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of C. difficile infection (CDI). We recently revealed crucial residues in the translocation domain of TcdB for the pore formation and toxin translocation. In this study, we investigated the effects of mutating a critical site involved in pore formation, Leu-1106, to residues that differ in size and polarity (Phe, Ala, Cys, Asp). We observed a broad range of effects on TcdB function in vitro consistent with the role of this site in pore formation and translocation. We show that mice challenged systemically with a lethal dose (LD100) of the most defective mutant (L1106K) showed no symptoms of disease highlighting the importance of this residue and the translocation domain in disease pathogenesis. These findings offer insights into the structure function of the toxin translocation pore, and inform novel therapeutic strategies against CDI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePathogens and DiseaseSame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207