MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2208375356 · doi:10.1109/cnsm.2015.7367370

Deterministic flow marking for IPv6 traceback (DFM6)

2015· article· en· W2208375356 on OpenAlexafffund
Vahid Aghaei-Foroushani, A. Nur Zincir‐Heywood

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCisco Systems
KeywordsIP tracebackComputer scienceIPv6Computer networkIPv4Network packetComputer securityDenial-of-service attackSpoofing attackNetwork securityThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although some security threats were taken into consideration in the IPv6 design, DDoS attacks still exist in the IPv6 networks. The main difficulty to counter the DDoS attacks is to trace the source of such attacks, as the attackers often use spoofed source IP addresses to hide their identity. This makes the IP traceback schemes very relevant to the security of the IPv6 networks. Given that most of the current IP traceback approaches are based on the IPv4, they are not suitable to be applied directly on the IPv6 networks. In this research, a modified version of the Deterministic Flow Marking (DFM) approach for the IPv6 networks, called DFM6, is presented. DFM6 embeds a fingerprint in only one packet of each flow to identify the origin of the IPv6 traffic traversing through the network. DFM6 requires only a small amount of marked packets to complete the process of traceback with high traceback rate and no false positives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207