Bibliographic record
Abstract
Normal 0 0 1 162 812 13 1 1136 11.1539 0 0 0 This paper aims to explore Philo of Alexandria’s perception of gender through his writings on the Sotah ritual described in Numbers 5:11-31, the trial by ordeal of the wife suspected of adultery by her husband. Philo’s writings on the Sotah ritual appear in his texts “The Special Laws” and “The Allegories of the Sacred Laws.” These commentaries are analyzed alongside near contemporaneous Tannaitic texts (the Mishnah and Tosefta Tractates relating to the ritual) and Josephus’ account of the ritual in “The Antiquities of the Jews.” Philo’s texts are examined for innovative themes and interpretations of the Sotah ritual in the context of these alternative commentaries. It is argued that Philo’s treatment of the Sotah ritual reveals a tendency towards a dismissal of the central role of the woman in the ritual. It is suggested that the Sotah herself is alternately dissolved into body parts or subsumed into aspects of the male soul, reflecting Philo’s preoccupation with purely male spiritual development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".