MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2208951633 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2015.2482904

Impact of Microscopic Vehicle Mobility on Cluster-Based Routing Overhead in <roman>VANETs</roman>

2015· article· en· W2208951633 on OpenAlexafffund
Khadige Abboud, Weihua Zhuang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOverhead (engineering)Computer networkNode (physics)Computer scienceRouting protocolWireless ad hoc networkTopology (electrical circuits)Cluster analysisDynamic Source RoutingRouting (electronic design automation)Cluster (spacecraft)Distributed computingEngineeringTelecommunicationsWirelessElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Node clustering is a potential solution to minimize the control signaling overhead of routing protocols in vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs). High relative vehicle mobility and frequent network topology changes induce instability to node clusters. Node cluster instability inflicts new challenges in maintaining a long route between network nodes, thus increasing the routing overhead. As a result, cluster instability, which is foisted by vehicle mobility, is a crucial issue for cluster-based routing in VANETs. This paper presents a stochastic analysis of the impact of cluster instability on generic routing overhead. A stochastic cluster instability model is adopted to capture the time variations of the cluster structure in terms of the cluster membership change rate and the cluster-overlap state change rate. First, we derive the probability distribution of the intracluster routing overhead using the cluster membership change rate. Second, the intercluster routing overhead is modeled as a rooted tree, with the tree nodes representing the value of the overhead and the tree edges weighted by the probability of a cluster-overlap state change. Numerical results are presented to evaluate the proposed models, which demonstrate a close agreement between analytical and simulation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207