MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2208978433

Forty Years of Restitution: A Retrospective

2011· article· en· W2208978433 on OpenAlexaff
John D. McCamus

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal principles and applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestitutionPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

undue influence * fiduciary duty * breach of confidence * profits from crime * profits from breach of contract * ineffective transactions * undue influence * unconscionability * mistake * matrimonial property Illustration 2. The contents of the law of restitution listed by their origins in common law and equity.9 The Restatement included much equitable doctrine.Thus, fiduciary obligation, the principal doctrinal home for the constructive trust in English law, is a central component of 8. Supra, footnote 2, at p. 12. 9.The list is expanded, from the table of contents of the first Restatement of Restitution, to include categories of restitutionary liability that have subsequently been recognized to deal with an analogous problems, including three topicsmatrimonial property, profits from breach of contract and self-serving intermeddlers that have been included in the new third Restatement of Restitution, the final instalment of which was approved by the Institute at its meetings in May of this year.American Law Institute, Restatement of the Laiw' Third: Restitution and Unjust Enrichment (Tentative Draft No. 7) (Philadelphia,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same topicLegal principles and applicationsFrench-language works237,207