MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2209160546

Prosodic licensing and Mandarin tone 2 sandhi - Interaction between tone and stress

2009· article· en· W2209160546 on OpenAlexaffabout
Chen Qu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMandarin ChineseTone (literature)Stress (linguistics)Register (sociolinguistics)Realization (probability)LinguisticsComputer scienceSpeech recognitionMathematicsPhilosophyStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Normal.dotm 0 0 1 104 596 University of Toronto 4 1 731 12.0 0 false 18 pt 18 pt 0 0 false false false This work explores the interaction between tone and stress in contour tone languages. Mandarin tone 2 (hence after T 2 ) sandhi is focused as this sandhi process is uniformly agreed as being induced by stress. In order to disambiguate the basic facts of this process, an experiment was designed and conducted. Based on the analysis of the results, a prosodic licensing account of T 2 sandhi is provided and two types of relations between tone and stress in Mandarin are attested. Statically, there is a relation between high register and prominence, between low register and non-prominence; between rising contour and prominence and between level tone and non-prominence. Dynamically, stress governs the realization of tone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhonetics and Phonology Research→French-language works237,207→