Quand les occupants défilent avec les occupés. Étude d’une coopération paradoxale entre militants israéliens et palestiniens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En prenant pour objet l’étude de la coopération entre des Palestiniens vivant sous occupation israélienne et des Israéliens engagés à leurs côtés, cet article s’intéresse à la question des rapports de domination traversant les mobilisations collectives. Plusieurs travaux de sociologie des mouvements sociaux se sont penchés sur l’effet des hiérarchies sociales sur les pratiques militantes et ont souligné les difficultés que peuvent avoir, à lutter ensemble, des acteurs inégalement dotés et prenant des risques différents sur le terrain. Dans le cas présent, les Israéliens qui rejoignent les Palestiniens dans leur lutte sont indirectement responsables du sort de ces derniers et restent, malgré eux, des occupants. Comment éviter, dès lors, que l’espace militant ne devienne un espace de reproduction des rapports de domination déjà à l’œuvre ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".