3D parametric hybrid inversion of time-domain airborne electromagnetic data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT We have developed a method to invert time-domain airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data using a parametric level-set approach combined with a conventional voxel-based technique to form a parametric hybrid inversion. The approach was designed for situations in which a voxel-based inversion alone may struggle. Such an example is where a distinct anomaly is present with sharp boundaries, and there is a large contrast between a low-resistivity target and a high-resistivity background. The first step of the proposed hybrid method used our novel parametric inversion to recover a best-fitting skewed Gaussian ellipsoid that represented the target of interest. Subsequently, the parametric result was set as an initial and reference model for the second stage, where smooth features with smaller resistivity contrasts were introduced into the model through a conventional voxel-based approach. The approach was tested with synthetic and field data. In the synthetic case, we recovered the size and dip of a conductive, thin, dipping plate with better accuracy compared with a voxel-based inversion. In the field example, we inverted AEM data over the Caber volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit. Based on information from past drilling, our results improve upon previous parametric plate inversions of the deposit itself, while additionally imaging the conductive cover over the deposit. These findings showcased how our parametric hybrid method can improve the accuracy of time-domain AEM inversions for thin dipping targets with large resistivity contrasts compared with the background.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it