Exercise-Never Too Late: The Meaning of Exercise for Advanced Palliative Care Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Increasing evidence supports the role of exercise for palliative care patients through maximizing physical function, improving fatigue and overall quality of life in the face of advancing disease. The objective of this study was to explore the meaning of exercise for these patients and their carers and to increase the understanding and value of exercise for this population.Methods: An emergent qualitative study design was employed using semi structured interviews with patients attending a palliative care gym program and their carers. Thirteen patients and seven carers participated.Interviews were taped and transcribed verbatim and analyzed to identify common themes.Results: Patients and carers identified improvement in strength, confidence and mood that enabled greater participation in life. Access to an open flexible program that allowed patients control of their exercise was important. Exercise contributed to promoting self identity and as a consequence provided a source of inner strength. Benefit was also felt from the shared positive experience in a safe environment. Carers used the session as a form of respite or opportunity for interaction.Conclusions: Patients perceive exercise as important as it enables independence but it also provides significant psychosocial and spiritual support. Carers similarly identify the benefits beyond improved physical function. Exercise is a positive treatment regime that contributes to wholistic care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".