MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2210076815 · doi:10.1532/hsf.1149

Immediate Extubation after Aortic Valve Surgery Using High Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia

2005· article· en· W2210076815 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas M. Hemmerling, Jean-Luc Choinière, Fadi Basile, Nhiên Lê, Jean François Olivier, Ignatio Prieto

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Heart Surgery Forum · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnesthesiaSurgeryFentanylRocuroniumPropofolPerioperativeAscending aortaHemodynamicsAortic valveAortic valve replacementAortaCardiologyStenosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose: Fast-track anesthesia has gained widespread use in cardiac centers around the world. No study has focused on immediate extubation after aortic valve surgery. This study examines the feasibility and hemodynamic stability of immediate extubation after simple or combined aortic valve surgery using thoracic epidural anesthesia. Methods: Thirty patients undergoing aortic valve surgery with an ejection fraction of more than 30% were included in this prospective audit. After insertion of a high thoracic epidural catheter, induction with fentanyl 2 to 4 microg/kg, administration of propofol 1 to 2 mg/kg, and endotracheal intubation facilitated by rocuronium, anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane titrated according to bispectral index (target, 50). Perioperative analgesia was provided by high thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) (bupivacaine 0.125% 6-14 mL/h). Hemodynamic data were compared by Friedman test. P <.05 was considered to show a significant difference. Data are presented as median (25th-75th percentile). Results: Patients underwent simple aortic valve surgery (n = 17) or combined aortic valve surgery (n = 13) with additional coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 8), replacement of the ascending aorta (Bentall procedure) (n = 4), and repair of open foramen ovale (n = 1). All 30 patients were extubated within 15 minutes after surgery at 36.5 degrees C (36.4 degrees C-36.6 degrees C). There was no need for reintubation. Pain scores were low immediately after surgery and 6, 24, and 48 hours after surgery at 0 (0-3.5), 0 (0-2), 0 (0-2), and 0 (0-2), respectively. During and up to 6 hours after surgery, there was no significant hemodynamic change due to TEA. Fifteen of 30 patients needed temporary pacemaker activation. There were no complications related to TEA. Conclusions: Immediate extubation is feasible after aortic valve surgery with high thoracic epidural analgesia and maintenance of hemodynamic stability throughout surgery. Immediate extubation after aortic valve surgery is a promising new path in cardiac anesthesia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.894

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Heart Surgery ForumSame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207