The psychosocial adjustment of the paraplegic : a study of reference groups
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is an ex:plorator;y study to enqu:ire into the psychosocial factors which affect the adjustment of the paraplegic.It is an individual thesis written as part of a group investigation on Paraplegia.The stuctr was carried out by five students of the Maritime School of Social W ork in partial fulfilment of the requirenents for the degree of Master of Social Work .The twenty-three subjects of the study were paraplegics registered at the Canadian Paraplegic Association, Atlantic Division, in September, 1968.Qtl.y those who were over sixteen ;yea.rs of age at time of disability, had been disabled for two years or more, and were residents of the Halifax-Dartmouth and County areas were considered.A questionnaire was administered by personal interview to obtain information pertinent to the five individual studies.This particular study dealt with reference groups.It was found that paraplegics use as a criterion of com~rison socio-economic and general health factors rather than the use of the legs.A majority of paraplegics had a positive image of their own menbership group as compared to specified reference groups, and there was the expected relationship between a good adjustment and a positive self-image.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".