MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2211021389 · doi:10.1016/j.rca.2015.10.002

Bloqueo axilar guiado por ultrasonido y neuroestimulador

2015· article· es· W2211021389 on OpenAlexaff
Luz María Lopera-Velásquez, Carlos Eduardo Restrepo‐Garcés

Bibliographic record

VenueColombian Journal of Anesthesiology · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBrachial plexusAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introducción: El bloqueo axilar del plexo braquial es un bloqueo anestésico ampliamente utilizado como técnica anestésica y analgésica en cirugía del miembro superior, específicamente para la mano, la muñeca y el antebrazo. El uso de neuroestimulador y ultrasonido ha aumentado la tasa de éxito de este bloqueo. El presente artículo hace una revisión no sistemática de la literatura más reciente relacionada con el bloqueo axilar del plexo braquial utilizando ultrasonido y estimulación de nervio periférico. Se hizo una búsqueda en las bases de datos de Cochrane, PubMed/Medline, Embase y OVID para la realización de una revisión no sistemática. El bloqueo del plexo braquial a nivel axilar es una técnica anestésica y analgésica para cirugía del miembro superior, con alto porcentaje de éxito y bajo grado de dificultad en cuanto a la realización del procedimiento. The axillary block of the brachial plexus is widely used as an anaesthesia and analgesia technique in upper limb surgery, specifically for hand, wrist and forearm procedures. The use of nerve stimulation and ultrasound guidance has increased the rate of success with this block. This article presents a non-systematic review of the most recent literature on axillary block of the brachial plexus using ultrasound and peripheral nerve stimulation. A search for a non-systematic review was conducted in the Cochrane, Pubmed/Medline, Embase and OVID databases. The axillary block of the brachial plexus is an anaesthetic and analgesic technique for upper limb surgery that has a high percentage of success, with a low degree of difficulty for the procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueColombian Journal of AnesthesiologySame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207