MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2211198877 · doi:10.1021/acs.oprd.5b00141

Application of Continuous Preferential Crystallization to Efficiently Access Enantiopure Chemicals

2015· article· en· W2211198877 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic Process Research & Development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrigins and Evolution of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDivision of ChemistryNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCrystallizationEnantiopure drugProcess (computing)Fractional crystallization (geology)Process engineeringThroughputBatch processingComputer scienceChemical engineeringChemistryEngineeringOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Preferential crystallization can be a highly efficient method of producing enantiopure chemicals at large scale. While most preferential crystallization processes have been designed around classical batch crystallizers, numerous advantages can be obtained by incorporating continuous crystallization technologies, allowing better process control and reproducibility with higher material throughput. Even with these marked advantages, continuous preferential crystallization is not utilized as often as a conventional batch process. This review aims to introduce the technique and highlight some examples where continuous preferential crystallization has been employed, emphasizing the advantages in process efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it