MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2211327244 · doi:10.7202/1033623ar

Explorer l’identité professionnelle chez les travailleurs sociaux en devenir

2015· article· fr· W2211327244 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Annie Pullen Sansfaçon, Isabelle Marchand, Josianne Crête

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles pratiques sociales · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les rapides changements structurels dans l’organisation des services complexifient le développement d’une identité professionnelle (IP) forte chez les travailleurs sociaux, pourtant essentielle à une pratique éthique. L’objectif de cette étude qualitative est d’explorer l’IP d’étudiants finissant au baccalauréat en travail social. Les résultats montrent comment l’IP est définie par les participants, ainsi que les quatre lieux qui contribuent spécifiquement à son développement. Discutant cette conceptualisation, des pistes de réflexion favorisant le développement d’une IP plus forte chez les étudiants en travail social sont identifiées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.369
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.413
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.061 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles pratiques socialesSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207