MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

“In the Bear Pit:” Considering<i>Da Vinci’s Inquest</i>in the Context of Representations and Discourses of Poverty in Canada

2002· article· en· W2211357229 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kim T. Kobayashi Elliott

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Political Economy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInquestDowntownPovertyContext (archaeology)GirlSociologyArt historyArtHistoryLawArchaeologyPolitical sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The season finale of Da Vinci's Inquest, In the Bear Pit, features Detectives Shannon and Leary investigating the death of a homeless man found in the Stanley Park Zoo's deserted bear cage; their concluding dialogue is reproduced above. A second storyline continues a thread developed throughout the series about the Downtown Eastside's missing women. The young woman/girl picked up by Detective Kosmo in one of the area's notorious alleys refuses to go to the local Downtown Eastside clinic to be tested for HIV and hepatitis: They treat you like you are in a zoo, she says.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0540.039
Scholarly communication0.0240.011
Open science0.0050.006
Research integrity0.0190.026
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Political EconomySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207