Relationship between Spiritual Well-Being and Life Satisfaction for Canadian Middle-Aged Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between spiritual well-being and life satisfaction for middle-aged adults who are between 35 to 64 years of age. A descriptive co-relational design was utilized in this study. The study involved the completion of a self-report questionnaire and the sample consisted of 62 subjects selected through convenience sampling. The spiritual well-being consists of two subscales: the religious well-being and the existential well-being. The Satisfaction with Life Scale was used to assess one aspect of subjective overall life satisfaction. The results showed that the relationship between spiritual well-being and life satisfaction for the middle-aged adults was strongly correlated (r=.373, p=001). There was no significant result in demographic characteristics with multiple regression analysis, but spiritual well-being significantly contributed to life satisfaction as a predictor that explained 13.9% of the variance among middle-aged adults. The research suggests spiritual wellbeing is a factor when examining strategies for life satisfaction toward successful aging in middle-aged adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".