Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
VenueThe European Physical Journal C · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaYork UniversityTRIUMFCarleton UniversityUniversity of VictoriaMcGill UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de MontréalInstitute of Particle PhysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungScience and Technology Facilities CouncilBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaH. Lundbeck A/SFondation Partager le SavoirEuropean Social FundRoyal SocietyCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueGeorgian National Science FoundationJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Research Center "Kurchatov Institute"British Columbia Knowledge Development FundMax-Planck-GesellschaftCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueIsrael Science FoundationComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesAustrian Science FundIsraeli Centers for Research ExcellenceU.S. Department of EnergyOntario Innovation TrustNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEuropean CommissionLeverhulme TrustFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAgence Nationale de la RechercheServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyNational Science FoundationLundbeckfondenCompute CanadaAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungTRIUMFDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)CERNDanmarks GrundforskningsfondCanarie
KeywordsAtlas (anatomy)PhysicsLarge Hadron ColliderATLAS experimentPileHadronJet (fluid)Spurious relationshipNuclear physicsAtlas detectorBackground subtractionParticle physicsDetectorEnergy (signal processing)Vertex (graph theory)Computer scienceAlgorithmMechanicsOpticsStatisticsMathematicsPixelDiscrete mathematics
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexThe large rate of multiple simultaneous proton-proton interactions, or pile-up, generated by the Large Hadron Collider in Run 1 required the development of many new techniques to mitigate the adverse effects of these conditions. This paper describes the methods employed in the ATLAS experiment to correct for the impact of pile-up on jet energy and jet shapes, and for the presence of spurious additional jets, with a primary focus on the large 20.3 [Formula: see text] data sample collected at a centre-of-mass energy of [Formula: see text]. The energy correction techniques that incorporate sophisticated estimates of the average pile-up energy density and tracking information are presented. Jet-to-vertex association techniques are discussed and projections of performance for the future are considered. Lastly, the extension of these techniques to mitigate the effect of pile-up on jet shapes using subtraction and grooming procedures is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.295
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
