MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2211552415

Comportamiento de la IED en Colombia entre el periodo 2000 a 2012 y los efectos esperados a raíz del tratado de libre comercio entre Colombia -Estados Unidos y Colombia - Canadá

2014· dissertation· es· W2211552415 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Barraza Perpiñán, Zully Leonor

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvestment (military)Welfare economicsCollateralCollateral damageFree trade agreementGeographyIntervention (counseling)Political scienceForeign direct investmentEconomyCartographyHumanitiesEconomicsFree tradeInternational tradeSociologyMedicinePoliticsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nineties was a positive for foreign direct investment period; movement that was favored by the process of opening the country; which passes from the eighties where Colombia was welcomed to the regulations of the Andean Group to a new decade characterized by a new economic and social model, called by some authors the neoliberal model; which based on an economic policy has sought to minimize state intervention in economic and social matters, defending the capitalist free market as collateral equilibrium in markets. The purpose of this study is analyzing some effects above the investment on the implementation of trade agreements that have been signed with countries like the U.S. and Canada is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInternational Relations in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207