MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2211751922 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2015-0636

Finite gravitational time dilation in black holes using dynamic Newtonian advanced gravity (DNAg)

2015· article· en· W2211751922 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andrew Worsley, Joseph Worsley

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsTime dilationBlack hole (networking)GravitationGravitational singularityGravitational time dilationClassical mechanicsEvent horizonNewtonian fluidBinary black holeNumerical relativityGravitational waveHorizonAstrophysicsTheory of relativityQuantum mechanicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we use a dynamic form of modified Newtonian gravity to reformulate the equations for gravitational time dilation. Here we introduce the generic equations for gravitational time dilation. It is shown that these equations agree exactly with gravitational time dilation in satellite navigation systems. The equations are also in agreement with a reanalysis of observations of gravitational red shifts in black hole accretion discs. Using these equations, we translate the time dilation into a finite value at the black hole event horizon. Thus this reformulation resolves the difficulties of the existence of black hole singularities. Importantly these dynamic gravitational equations provide testable predictions in the vicinity of black holes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations→French-language works237,207→