Bibliographic record
Abstract
Urban oil spills are frequent in many industrialized cities and towns. Although the volume of an inland oil spill is usually small compared to that of an ocean oil spill, the frequency of inland oil spills is far greater than that of ocean oil spills. Thus, the cumulative volume of inland oil spills can still cause significant environmental impacts on the receiving water bodies. This paper describes an inland spill management study in an industrial city in the Greater Toronto Area in Canada. The study began with a compilation of oil spill database, Characteristics of oil spill events were analyzed at different spill locations. It was found that human errors and equipment failures were the primary causes of oil spills. Geographic Information System was then used to identify spill prone sewersheds. By overlaying storm drainage systems with spill locations, stormwater ponds receiving these spills were identified for retrofit. For storm outfalls which discharge directly into watercourses, downstream publicly-owned land were identified for the potential installation of oil-water interceptors, This study demonstrates that good planning is important to manage oil spills in urbanized areas,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".