Las transformaciones de ápoca augustea en el "Mons Aesculapii": contextos cerámicos relacionados con la construcción de la "cavea" del teatro y sus accesos perimetrales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolCon la construccion del edificio de espectaculos en el ultimo cuarto del siglo I a.C., se materializa una profunda transformacion urbana de la ladera, que se manifiesta de forma directa con la amortizacion del area residencial preterita, pero tambien mediante cambios en el trazado mas proximo de la muralla, asi como en la amortizacion del area sacra ubicada en la parte superior de la ladera. Los contextos estratigraficos relacionados con estas amortizaciones y la construccion del edificio de espectaculos, nos ofrecen una excelente oportunidad de analizar la dinamica comercial de la ciudad en esos momentos finales del siglo I a.C. EnglishWith the construction of the performing arts building in the last quarter of the first century BC, a major urban transformation of the slope began to take shape, manifested directly by the degradation of the old residential area, but also by changes in the delineation closest to the wall, as well as the degradation of the sacral area located at the top of the slope. The stratigraphic contexts related to this degradation and the construction of the performing arts building provide an excellent opportunity to analyze the commercial dynamics of the city in those final moments of the first century BC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".