MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2212040916

Abstract: The Baring Granite and St. Stephen Gabbro of New Brunswick and Maine: petrology, geochemistry, and tectonic setting

2001· article· en· W2212040916 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kirsten McLaughlin, Sandra M. Barr

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Geology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGabbroGeologyGeochemistryDioriteNoriteAnorthositeMaficQuartz monzoniteHornblendePetrologyZirconPlagioclaseIgneous rockPlutonBiotiteQuartzTectonicsPaleontology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Baring Granite and St. Stephen Gabbro are a probable comagmatic suite situated in the area of St. Stephen, New Brunswick and Calais, Maine. The intrusions are traditionally included as part of the Moosehorn Igneous Complex, in addition to the Staples Mountain Gabbro, the Calais Gabbro-Diorite and several small unnamed diorite intrusions, within the Coastal Maine Magmatic Province. They intruded the Cookson Group of the St. Croix terrane of the northern Appalachian orogen, a sequence of quartzofeldspathic sedimentary rocks, quartzite, carbonaceous pelite, and minor mafic tuff. The age of the intrusions is not well constrained but previous U-Pb geochronology suggested a Silurian age. A suite of samples has been collected from the intrusions for more detailed investigation of the petrology, petrogenesis, tectonic setting, and age. The St. Stephen Gabbro · consists of complexly intermingled olivine gabbro, olivine gabbronorite, and olivine norite, with less abundant gabbro, gabbronorite, norite, troctolite, anorthosite, and dunite. Previous chemical studies are inconclusive with respect to chemical affinity and tectonic setting at the time of emplacement. The pluton hosts numerous discrete sulphide mineralization zones. Mineralization has been interpreted to have formed in two stages, including orthomagmatic (Ni-Cu-Co) mineralization and a later hydrothermal mineralization (Ni-Cu-Zn). The Baring Granite is coarse-grained, hypidiomorphic, granular, and is composed of microcline, plagioclase, quartz, hornblende, and biotite. Accessory minerals include zircon, apatite, and titanite. The mafic mineral content of the Baring Granite is quite low, generally 10% or less. Locally, the Baring Granite and St. Stephen Gabbro are intensely intermingled, with inconclusive cross-cutting features, such as enclaves and dikes visible at the outcrop scale. Cuspate intermingling textures suggest that the granitic magma intruded the gabbroic rocks prior to complete crystallization. Diorite is typically present between the gabbroic and granitic rocks. The cross-cutting relationships, where a gabbro outcrop is cut by diorite and then by granite may suggest that intense intermingling occurred at the onset of granite intrusion, but became less intense as emplacement of the Baring Granite continued. Comparison of the Baring Granite and St. Stephen Gabbro to other Silurian-Devonian plutons of the Coastal Maine Magmatic Province and equivalent (?) units in New Brunswick such as the Bocabec Complex may help in the definition of terrane boundaries in southwestern New Brunswick and southeastern Maine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantic GeologySame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207