Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: We evaluated the outcome of femoral stem revision for Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective assessment of 15 patients who had received treatment for a periprosthetic unstable femoral fracture after primary hip arthroplasty between May 1997 and September 2009. According to Vancouver classification, 11 patients were type B2 and four were B3. Open reduction and long stem revision were performed in all 15 cases. In Vancouver type B3 fractures, we treated patients with open reduction and long stem revision with an allogenic cancellous bone graft, which is the same as in that used in Vancouver type B2 fractures. An allogenic onlay cortical bone graft was used when additional stability was required. The mean age of patients was 67.1 years at the time of surgery and the mean duration of follow-up was 31.5 months. We described the clinical and radiographic results. Results: Using Beals and Tower’s criteria, fair to good clinical and radiologic results were observed at the latest follow up, with an average Harris hip score of 94.4 points. Fractures were united in all 15 patients. One patient had non-union of the greater trochanter of the femur, one patient had superficial infection, and one patient had non-union of onlay bone graft, however, there were no further complications, such as dislocations, periprosthetic infections, or nerve injuries. There was no loosening of the femoral stems. Conclusion: In Vancouver type B2 and B3 fractures, when there is loosening of the femoral stems, open reduction and long stem revision with allogenic cancellous bone graft provided a satisfactory result. However, long-term follow up is needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".