MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2212053060 · doi:10.5539/ies.v8n10p40

Do Preadolescent after School Activities Predict the Mother-Child Relationship in Taiwan?

2015· article· en· W2212053060 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Li-Ching Sun, Shu-Yin Tsai

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Education Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicImpact of Technology on Adolescents
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyPerceptionRegression analysisContrast (vision)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates whether preadolescent after school activities predict the mother-child relationship. A total of 346 5th and 6th grade elementary school students and their mothers participated. The students were asked to write down after school activities they are involved in as well as the time slots for a week. Correlation and multiple regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between after school activities and the mother-child relationship. The results showed that organized activity participation was not significantly associated with the mother-child relationship. Playing computer games, literature, and artistic activities were significant to the prediction of the mother-child relationship even after demographic variables were statistically controlled for. The more time spent on literature and artistic activities increased preadolescent perception of the mother-child relationship. In contrast, the length of time for playing computer games decreased preadolescent and mother perception of the mother-child relationship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Education Studies→Same topicImpact of Technology on Adolescents→French-language works237,207→