MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Polarization Transfer in Wide-Angle Compton Scattering and Single-Pion Photoproduction from the Proton

2015· article· en· W2212260658 on OpenAlexaff
C. Fanelli, E. Cisbani, D. Hamilton, G. Salmè, B. Wojtsekhowski, A. Ahmidouch, J. R. M. Annand, H. Baghdasaryan, J. Beaufait, P. Bosted, E. J. Brash, C. Butuceanu, P. Carter, E. Christy, E. Chudakov, S. Danagoulian, Donal B. Day, P. V. Degtyarenko, R. Ent, H. Fenker, Michael J. Fowler, E. Frlež, D. Gaskell, R. Gilman, T. Horn, G. M. Huber, C. W. de Jager, Eric Jensen, M. Jones, A. Kelleher, C. Keppel, M. Khandaker, M. Köhl, G. Kumbartzki, S. Lassiter, Y. Li, R. Lindgren, Henry Lovelace, W. Luo, D. Mack, V. Mamyan, D. J. Margaziotis, P. Markowitz, J. Maxwell, G. Mbianda, D. Meekins, M. Meziane, J. Miller, A. Mkrtchyan, H. Mkrtchyan, J. Mulholland, V. Nelyubin, L. Pentchev, C. F. Perdrisat, E. Piasetzky, Y. Prok, A. J. R. Puckett, V. Punjabi, M. Shabestari, A. Shahinyan, K. Slifer, G. R. Smith, P. Solvignon, R. Subedi, F. R. Wesselmann, S. A. Wood, Z. Ye, Xiaochao Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareThomas Jefferson National Accelerator FacilityScience and Technology Facilities CouncilIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsScatteringCompton scatteringPartonProtonPolarization (electrochemistry)RecoilPhotonPionNuclear physicsAtomic physicsQuarkOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wide-angle exclusive Compton scattering and single-pion photoproduction from the proton have been investigated via measurement of the polarization transfer from a circularly polarized photon beam to the recoil proton. The wide-angle Compton scattering polarization transfer was analyzed at an incident photon energy of 3.7 GeV at a proton scattering angle of θ_{cm}^{p}=70°. The longitudinal transfer K_{LL}, measured to be 0.645±0.059±0.048, where the first error is statistical and the second is systematic, has the same sign as predicted for the reaction mechanism in which the photon interacts with a single quark carrying the spin of the proton. However, the observed value is ~3 times larger than predicted by the generalized-parton-distribution-based calculations, which indicates a significant unknown contribution to the scattering amplitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207