MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2212361420

Global Economic Crisis

2010· article· en· W2212361420 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tiberius Danut Epure, Ramona Gruescu, Brãiloiu Liviu

Bibliographic record

VenueOvidius University Annals Economic Sciences Series · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecessionFinancial crisisGlobal recessionFinancial systemEconomicsFinancial marketFinancial sectorFinancial stabilityBusinessQuarter (Canadian coin)Economic policyEconomyFinanceMacroeconomicsGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global economy is in the middle of the deepest and most widespread post-war recession. U.E. economy is not spared either. The strong increase in the financial crisis in autumn 2008 has led global economic downturn which, in turn, has further weakened the financial sector. Over time, the ambitious political actions taken by governments and central banks in late autumn 2008, have prevented a collapse of financial systems and managed to bring a degree of stability, but financial markets and institutions still remain under stress. The global economy is in a deep recession. The economic situation remains very uncertain [1]. Investor confidence in the banking sector remains fragile, despite improvements that marked certain market segments. This forecast assumes that the measures in place to support the banking sector will begin to have a greater impact in coming quarters, which also facilitates the transmission of monetary policy stance to support the real economy. An improved performance of the banking sector by the end of 2009 should provide the basis for a progress of bank loans. As the financial crisis has intensified, global trade and industrial production has virtually collapsed in the last quarter of 2008.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOvidius University Annals Economic Sciences SeriesSame topicGlobal Financial Crisis and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207