Seismic Performance of GFRP-Reinforced Concrete Rectangular Columns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an assessment of the seismic performance of concrete columns internally reinforced with glass-fiber-reinforced polymers (GFRP) bars. Eight full-scale column prototypes with 1,650-mm shear span and 350-mm square cross-section were constructed and tested under combined lateral cyclic quasi-static and constant axial loading. The test specimens represent the lower portion of first-story columns between the footing and the contra-flexure point. The test parameters included longitudinal reinforcement type and ratio, level of axial load, and stirrup spacing. Test results showed that the drift capacity of GFRP-reinforced concrete (RC) rectangular columns at failure ranged between 8.5 and 12.5%, which exceeds the limitations of North American building codes. This indicates that the deformability of GFRP-RC column prototypes successfully replaced the ductility in steel–RC columns in dissipating the seismic energy in the presence of constant axial load. Furthermore, there was insignificant strength degradation before failure due to the well-confined concrete core.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".