HUBUNGAN KAUSALITAS ANTARA KREDIT PERBANKAN DAN TINGKAT PRODUKTIVITAS DI KALIMANTAN BARAT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research titled is Causality Relationship Between Bank Credit and Productivity Level In West The aim of this study was to obtain and analyze empirical evidence about the causality relationship between bank credit disbursed and productivity level in West Kalimantan. This study was conducted by using Granger causality test that was processed using Eviews 6.0 as tools of analysis. This research use secondary data that are bank credit and productivity data in West Kalimantan from 2005-2014 (time series) with a quarter of the data so that the amount of data observation are 40 data. The results showed a two-way causality relationship between variable of bank credit and variable of productivity level in West Kalimantan. Level of significant trust of two variables is on 5% and the probability value is smaller than the level of significant trust on 5%, so that bank credit (X) significantly affect the level of productivity (Y) and conversely the level of productivity (Y) significantly affect bank credit in West Kalimantan. Keywords: Causality, Bank Credit and Productivity Level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".