MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2212861785 · doi:10.22230/cjc.2015v40n4a2955

Les revendications médiatisées kanakes et les nouvelles formes d’engagement politique

2015· article· en· W2212861785 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Léonie Marin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Communication · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNew Caledonia Indigenous Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)PoliticsThe InternetIdentity (music)SociologyContext (archaeology)CensorshipPublic spherePolitical scienceBalance (ability)VisibilityCollective identityMedia studiesHumanitiesLawAestheticsArtHistoryPsychologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyzes mediated claims by the Kanak, from the written press to the Internet. It focusses on the transformation of the social discourses of this people in their struggle for power in a context of censorship. Considering the “before” and “after” of the Internet, this research seeks to elucidate forms of resistance involving cultural, social and political interests. The individualization of expression made possible by the Internet produces new forms of political engagement, and the resulting actions are part of a quest for visibility that changes collective identity affiliations. Thus, the emergence of Kanak claims into the public sphere does not really challenge the balance of power, but rather questions identity issues made manifest by various forms of political engagement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0120.055
Scholarly communication0.0250.016
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CommunicationSame topicNew Caledonia Indigenous StudiesFrench-language works237,207