Effect of Cavity Volume on the Flow-Excited Acoustic Resonance of a Shallow Cavity in a Pipe-Line
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of cavity volume on the aeroacoustic source generated by fully developed pipe flow through an axisymmetric shallow cavity is investigated experimentally. Nine cavity sizes are studied in three different groups of length, L, to depth, H, ratios (L/H = 1, 2 and 3) with three different cavity volumes for each group of L/H. The Sound Wave Method (SWM) is used to measure the aeroacoustic sources as function of the Strouhal number. This methodology does not require knowledge of the details of the unsteady flow-sound interaction in the cavity region because it considers the cavity as a black box with a dipole sound source or sink. The aeroacoustic source strength and the Strouhal number corresponding to its maximum value are found to increase in a systematic manner as the cavity volume is increased for the same L/H ratio. These results indicate that the aeroacoustic sources of shallow cavities are affected not only by the ratio L/H, but also by the cavity volume.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".