La importancia de las relaciones investigador-investigado: el caso de las narrativas de vida profesional.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo aborda un tema fundamental en los estudios llevados a cabo desde una perspectiva construccionista y narrativa: el de la relación entre investigadores e investigados. Nuestra aportación se basa en la elaboración de nueve microetnografías, en las que hemos tenido en cuenta de forma especial la dimensión biográfica, con nueve docentes de enseñanza primaria, lo que nos ha permitido: a) poner de manifiesto la importancia de explicitar la relación entre investigadores e investigados; b) examinar las fortalezas y las debilidades de cada tipo y modalidad de relación; c) apuntar la complejidad y el dinamismo de los elementos que configuran las relaciones; d) abrir vía de indagación que puede contribuir a profundizar en los aspectos relacionales que subyacen a la construcción social del conocimiento.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it