New Gender Perspectives for the Millennium: Challenges and Successful Models of North-South Collaboration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ladies and Gentlemen, I wish to thank the organizers of the African Studies Association's Women's Caucus for inviting me to share with you gender perspectives for the millennium as well as some of the challenges and successful models of North-South collaboration. As a development practitioner, my human rights activism, which spans several years and a number of continents, is now specifically located in an organization whose ideals I share. As Executive Director of MATCH International Centre, a 24-year-old women's development organization based in Canada, I am fortunate, while working in a field of personal interest, to work with several women's groups; groups whose membership and leadership cover the geographic regions of Anglophone and Francophone Africa, Asia, the Caribbean and South America. MATCH collaborates with women's groups who are committed to women's full and active participation in the development of their societies, who recognize the inequities that exists in their communities and who are finding creative ways to challenge the structures that impede the equal participation of women. Though much success has been achieved much remains to be done.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".