MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W22131574

Techniques for Handling JSF Exceptions, Messages and Contexts.

2006· article· en· W22131574 on OpenAlex
Dwight Deugo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Internet Computing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBusiness logicLayer (electronics)JavaWeb applicationInterface (matter)User interfaceWorld Wide WebStack (abstract data type)Human–computer interactionSoftware engineeringProgramming languageOperating systemDatabase
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract- JavaServer Faces is a new technology that helps developers build web applications using Java. Rather than generating stack traces as responses to invalid client requests, in this paper we describe techniques for gracefully handling checked and unchecked exceptions and HTML status codes in JavaServer Faces applications. As part of our solution we describe how to create messages for the user as responses to errors. Since it is never advisable to have your business layer know which application framework your user interface layer is using, we also describe a method for making objects and messages from the business layer available to the user interface layer without coupling the former to the latter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it